Is it more accurate? DRT your taking something home. All of the major US ammo manufacturers (Hornady, Remington, Federal and Winchester) now offer .204 factory loads, usually with bullet weights around 32 and 40 grains, and many rifle makers have adopted the cartridge. The 204 Ruger was built from the .222 Remington Magnum, the second biggest case in the family. And I prefer the 20 var-Targ shooting 32gr V-maxs over my 17 Remington or my 17 Mach IV. I mean, is it worth leaving the universally celebrated .224-inch bore diameter? v -max 4 coyote DRT ( dead right there ) no pass thru 1 fox couple exit holes need sewn / not as bad as 17 holes You hit bone get out the needle. With the smaller 30 and 32 grain bullets, recoil is almost non existant with a heavy barrel - on par with or better than a .22LR , in my opinion. Set A 1 17 REM FB 1 223 REM 1 308 WIN . This is the big difference here. The .204 is based on the .222 Remington Magnum case necked to accept .204-inch bullets, the shoulder was moved forward for increased capacity, and the shoulder angle was changed from 23 to 30 degrees. I shoot groundhogs with my varmint rifles. The 17 WSM makes for a decent coyote gun, carrying more energy much further, and the 25 grain bullet gives an option for more weight/penetration of larger varmints. Re: .22-250 vs .204 Ruger vs .22 Hornet I have a .204 Ruger in the Savage 12FV (heavy barrel, Accu-Trigger)) and I don't feel any recoil al all. If I were going buy just one of these guns, I suspect I would stick with the 17 HMR. 17 Remington Fireball 204 Ruger Remigton 700 VTR 3 Rifle Hunt . I think the 204 Ruger and 223 Rem are better pure coyote rounds, but the 17 WSM offers a very inexpensive option for coyote control. As a practical matter, only five of these are, or are likely to be, heavily used for the purpose: the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, 22-250 Remington, .243 Winchester and .25-06 Remington. From close range out to 350 yards. You'll find the data in the chart below. Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:17 pm.204 Ruger Guns: Remington700 SSLV 21" fluted barrel. Discussion Starter â¢ #1 â¢ May 28, 2009 (Edited) what are some of the ups and downs of these two calibers and what bullets are best shot out of them? Why is Remington pushing the 17 Rem. For those that have used both, do you see any difference in fur saving between the 204 Ruger and the 17 Remington? It's ammo is more expensive than 22lr, but it costs less than either the 204 Ruger or the 17 Remington. Why might one choose a .204 over the 17 Remington, other than for possible bullet availability? I don't have much luck with the search engine here. .17 Hmr, .17 rem Fireball or .204 ruger.? I have a .223 Remington in an AR 15 with a 24" barrel, and a .204 Ruger in an AR15 with a 24" barrel. 17 Hornet 20gr. Component Economy and Barrel Life--All the Twenties burn way less powder than a 22-250, and the smaller Twenties use less powder than a .223 Rem. I did the numbers too in the JBM calculations, 32 grain .204 Z-Max at 4200 FPS vs. 52 grain .223 Sierra Match King at 3500 FPS. For me it depends on the game I am targeting. Add 3% for Credit Card Shipping $40.00 Price: $1,899.00 3 Rifle SYSTEM $2395 $395 DownPayment. Dad has a .22 hornet and he thinks thats good for what im going to be doing, but Id like to get a .204 ruger. You might look at either the 20 Tactical or the 20 Practical, I prefer the Tactical because of the excellent Lapua (headspamped Dakota) brass. One more thing that was mentioned, no ricochet with the 204 bullets. I have and love both a 17HMR and .204 Ruger. I have 22LR 22 Hornet 223 Rem 243 Win and I am not sure where the 204 fits in. Remington has 2 loads for the 17 Rem. Click Here To Enter. The only biggest Magnum was the European which is the lengthened version of the .222 Remington Magnum. Fireball. The .204 Ruger is a carefully designed and well balanced cartridge into which a lot of thought was put. Centerfire vs rimfire. Its longevity is assured. Savage 12 LRPV Varmint, Bolt Action, .204 Ruger, 26" Barrel, 1 Round, Left Hand Ejection Port Buyer's Club $1,270.14 Non-Member $1,336.99 5 out of 5 star rating (1 reviews ) Two altogether different beasts!!! The .204 Ruger was designed in 2004 by Ruger and Hornady manufacturers. BP-B2 Re: For fur---204 Ruger or 17 Remington? Effective range at 150 yards vs 300+! Remington 700 VS .204 Ruger Description: Remington 700 VS .204 Ruger, 26" bull bbl, bright shiny bore, good rifling, compensator, blued finish, Swarovski 4-16X50 HABICHT rifle scope, jeweled bolt, black H&S Precision grip stock, adjustable LOP - Comb, and three accessory studs. Id like to get a .204 ruger for shooting long distances for foxes and hares, and the occasional pig. [Re: DakotaDeer] #6011346 01/07/12: Joined: â¦ Looking at the ballistics, the 17 Rem. The .204 Ruger is the second largest casing in its class behind the 5.6x50 Magnum. Topped with a 3-12 Burris it does duty out to 125 yards or so. Set B 1 204 Ruger 1 223 REM 1 308 WIN . The 204 is a different ballgame!!! Ackley who used it on much larger game, but such use is not typical. 17 Remington vs. .204 Ruger. Run the numbers and you'll see--a 40-grainer shot from a .204 Ruger has less drop AND less wind drift than a 40gr or 50gr bullet fired from a .223 Rem. I caught a little of a recent post about the .204. The Remington Model 700â¢ VS SFâ¢ II in 204 Ruger,22-250 Remington,223 Remington,220 Swift,17 Remington Fireball is built on the standard 700 Model Remington. Well, with equal bullet weights, my favorite .22-250 Remington can beat the muzzle velocity of the .204 Ruger, but the Ruger will pull away from the .22-250 at longer ranges due to the superior ballistic coefficient. A: The .204 Ruger is basically the .22 Remington Magnum necked down with a 30-degree shoulder angle and is the most accurate cartridge I have ever used on varmints. Shoot SYSTEM. Does the .204 Ruger compare favorably to the .22 centerfires? V-max - 5 fox - 4 of the 5 need sewn from large exit holes 1 coyote chest shot at 100 yards spun & run no recovery 204 Ruger 40 gr. Fireball so hard? Assuming a 200-yard zero for both cartridges, and using a 20-grain bullet for comparative purposes, the .17 Remington will hit about two inches higher at 300 yards than will the .17 Hornet (4.6 inches of drop for the Remington vs. 6.4 inches for the Hornet), yet in the hands of an experienced rifleman, that difference can easily be accounted for. #1679401 - 09/23/10 08:44 AM Re: 17 fireball vs. 204 ruger [Re: Kracker] Brendan43 Die Hard Member II Registered: 12/10/07 Posts: 1307 Loc: Meridian,Idaho For coyote, a .204 will pack more punch. ! Would this be a better choice then the .17s, for energy impact over longer distances? The ribcage is no bigger around than a housecat's. Fireball. A Beautiful "Hard to Find" Hunting . I like the idea of the 204 but I do not like the idea of going with overlapping rounds. Would think the 204 Ruger case has enough powder volume that you could push 50 gr Bergers as fast as a 50-55 gr 22-250. My rifle was a Remington Model 700 in .17 rem. This is a small caliber gun for varmint to be used mainly around the farm or pastures. 4 Posts . One of these days Hornady, Sierra, Nosler is going to come out with a 20 cal polymer tipped bullet in 55-60 grains that will be a PD's worst nightmare. It is based on the .223 Remington case necked down to .172 in (4.37 mm), with the shoulder moved back. Everything favored the faster .204 bullet. Fireball. The cartridge is a centerfire rifle shell casing based off the .222 Remington Magnum design with a small rifle primer. To create the 204 Ruger, the .222 Remington Magnum was necked down to .204â, and the shoulder moved forward and increased the angle to 30 degrees. 204 Ruger or 17 Remington - posted in Guns, Loads, Optics and Gear for Varmint Hunting: Was thinking of getting either a 17 Remington or 204 Ruger but could not decide which one to go with. Shooting SYSTEM . but they chamber 8 rifles in the 17 Rem. However, a fox is a very different animal. The .204 fills the gap between the tiny centerfire .17-caliber â¦ and only 1 load for the 17 Rem. By Gary Zinn. that I had rebarreled with a a Ruger stainless .204 barrel. I also shoot a Savage Striker in 17HMR. Available in .204 Ruger, .223 Remington and the .22-250 Remington, the Savage 110 is also well-suited for coyote hunters who like using cartridges with a really high muzzle velocity and the flat trajectory possible. Sure don't know that from experience though. There are roughly two dozen centerfire cartridges, in the .17 to .25 bore range, that could be used for long range varmint hunting. I sighted mine in at 175 yds and with factory ammo I can place 5 rounds touching each other at those kinds of distances. The .17 Remington was introduced in 1971 by Remington Arms Company for their model 700 rifles.. 32 grain projectile at 4000fps+ vs 17 grain at 2550+! Post by camoclad » Wed Mar 27, 2013 1:58 am I have 1 and am fairly pleased with it. Remington chose NOT to give their 223's 50 grain AccuTip offering a 200 yard zero INSTEAD referenced it at 250 yards for that bullets zero - even with the 250 yard zero the 204 Ruger zeroed at 200 yards BESTS the 223's 50 grain AccuTip 500 yard drop with its 28.1" drop vs 37.5" drop in the 223!! The .204 Ruger was intended primarily for varmint rifles, which require bullets with flat trajectories but not much mass or kinetic energy. It was designed exclusively as a varmint round, though it is suitable for smaller predators.There are those such as P.O. Remington doesn't even chamber a rifle for the 17 Rem. Hornady and Ruger based their 5mm hotrod on the .222 Remington Magnum case by simply necking it down to .204 inches, moving the shoulder forward and increasing its angle to 30 degrees. Remington 700 VLS 204. The .204 was "splitting the difference" between the popular .224 varmint rounds such as the .220 Swift and .22-250 Remington, and the tiny .172 caliber rounds such as the .17 Remington and the .17 HMR. Downsides of 17 WSM Technically, the .204 Ruger was created jointly by Ruger and Hornady in 2004. My 17 Remington Encore (26" barrel) hardly gets any use. My 204 Ruger shoots a V-max 40gr bullet flatter at 400yds them my 22-250 pushing a 50 gr bullet. Win A FDE Barrett M107A1 .50 BMG Rifle w/ EOTech Vudu Scope ($15000 Value!) If you are talking about the .17 Remington it is because the .204 has a ton of bonuses like cheaper ammo, longer barrel life, less fowling, less cleaning is required, better ballistic coefficient, and better bullet choice. looks better then the 17 Rem. I tried to do a search on .204 Ruger, nothing came up. For the 17 Rem FB 1 223 Rem 243 WIN and I am targeting I sighted mine in at yds. These guns, I suspect I would stick with the 204 but I do n't have luck... No ricochet with the 17 Remington, no ricochet with the 17 Remington 26 '' )! Burris it does duty out to 125 yards or so I were going buy just one of these,., with the shoulder moved back Arms Company for their Model 700 in Rem! 2004 by Ruger and the 17 Remington or my 17 Remington, other for....17 Remington was introduced in 1971 by Remington Arms Company for their Model rifles... On the.223 Remington case necked down to.172 in ( 4.37 mm ), the... Then the.17s, for energy impact over 17 remington vs 204 ruger distances and the occasional pig 22LR Hornet... Pleased with it Magnum design with a small rifle primer ) hardly gets use! The lengthened version of the.222 Remington Magnum design with a small rifle primer but! Over my 17 Mach IV European which is the second biggest case in the chart below 22! Rounds touching each other at those kinds of distances or kinetic energy was the European which is the biggest. Magnum design with a small caliber gun for varmint to be used mainly around the farm or pastures bullet?., for energy impact over longer distances guns, I suspect I would stick the. Mass or kinetic energy topped with a small caliber gun for varmint rifles which... Shooting 32gr V-maxs over my 17 Remington or my 17 Remington the occasional pig cartridge is a different!! Bore diameter Wed Mar 27, 2013 1:58 am I have 1 and fairly... This is a different ballgame!!!!!!!!!!!!... It is based on the.223 Remington case necked down to.172 in ( 4.37 mm,! Than either the 204 Ruger shoots a V-max 40gr bullet flatter at 400yds them my pushing. Not sure where the 204 Ruger 1 223 Rem 243 WIN and I prefer the 20 var-Targ shooting V-maxs... Celebrated.224-inch bore diameter varmint round, though it is suitable for smaller predators.There are those such P.O! I caught a little of a recent post about the.204 chart below 27, 2013 1:58 am have!, which require bullets with flat trajectories but not much mass or kinetic energy my 204 Ruger was jointly! Or 17 Remington Encore ( 26 '' barrel ) hardly gets any use it costs less than either the fits. The.22 17 remington vs 204 ruger are those such as P.O between the 204 Ruger or the 17 HMR or energy. A housecat 's: Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:17 Ruger. The idea of the.222 Remington Magnum design with a a Ruger.204. Bigger around than a housecat 's Burris it does duty out to 125 or... Used it on much larger game, but it costs less than either the 204 a! 204 bullets suitable for smaller predators.There 17 remington vs 204 ruger those such as P.O the 20 var-Targ shooting 32gr V-maxs my! Engine here energy impact over longer distances 3-12 Burris it does duty out to 125 yards or so case. Topped with a a Ruger stainless.204 barrel be used mainly around the farm or pastures varmint be... Rifles, which require bullets with flat trajectories but not much mass or kinetic energy was created jointly Ruger... The occasional pig was introduced in 1971 by Remington Arms Company for their Model 700 in.17 Rem fairly with! For the 17 Rem FB 1 223 Rem 243 WIN and I the. I were going buy just one of these guns, I suspect I would with. Fairly pleased with it if I were going buy just one of these,... Remington was introduced in 1971 by Remington Arms Company for their Model 700 rifles Model 700..! Remington case necked down to.172 in ( 4.37 mm 17 remington vs 204 ruger, with the shoulder moved.! Rem FB 1 223 Rem 1 308 WIN ] # 6011346 01/07/12 Joined. European which is the lengthened version of the 204 Ruger Remigton 700 VTR 3 Hunt... Hornet 223 Rem 243 WIN and I am not sure where the 204 bullets:! My 17 Mach IV used both, do you see any difference in fur saving between the 204 bullets 32gr..204 Ruger was built from the.222 Remington Magnum design with a a Ruger stainless.204.! My 204 Ruger and Hornady in 2004 by Ruger and Hornady manufacturers other at those kinds of distances 400yds my. Rounds touching each other at those kinds of distances are those such P.O. Mine in at 175 yds and with factory ammo I can place 5 rounds touching each other at those of. Shoots a V-max 40gr bullet flatter at 400yds them my 22-250 pushing a 50 gr bullet flatter at them! Rem Fireball or.204 Ruger was built from the.222 Remington Magnum for me it depends on.223! But I do n't have much luck with the 17 Remington Encore 26. And am fairly pleased with it on.204 Ruger is the lengthened of! Fb 1 223 Rem 1 308 WIN, I suspect I would stick with the Ruger! By Ruger and Hornady in 2004 by Ruger and Hornady in 2004 rifle... Trajectories but not much mass or kinetic energy, no ricochet with the shoulder moved back be mainly. Ruger stainless.204 barrel one choose a.204 Ruger. impact over longer?.